On the Complexity of Blocks-World Planning

In this paper, we show that in the best-known version of the blocks world (and several related versions), planning is difficult, in the sense that finding an optimal plan is NP-hard. However, the NP-hardness is not due to deleted-condition interactions, but instead due to a situation which we call a deadlock. For problems that do not contain deadlocks, there is a simple hill-climbing strategy that can easily find an optimal plan, regardless of whether or not the problem contains any deleted-condition interactions. The above result is rather surprising, since one of the primary roles of the blocks world in the planning literature has been to provide examples of deleted-condition interactions such as creative destruction and Sussman’s anomaly. However, we can explain why deadlocks are hard to handle in terms of a domain-independent goal interaction which we call an enabling-condition interaction, in which an action invoked to achieve one goal has a side-effect of making it easier to achieve other goals. If different actions have different useful side-effects, then it can be difficult to determine which set of actions will produce the best plan. Please address all correspondence to the second author. This work was supported in part by NSF Grants NSFD CDR-88-03012 and IRI-8907890. Also with LNK Corporation, College Park, MD. Also affiliated with the University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies.